<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Vs Dedicated Servers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dediserve.com/virtual-vs-dedicated-servers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dediserve.com/virtual-vs-dedicated-servers/</link>
	<description>Cloud infrastructure as a Service provider - Ireland and UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 19:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtual Vs Dedicated Servers &#124; dediserve Blog &#124; Web Hosting Geeks - Shared Web Hosting, VPS, Dedicated Servers, Virtualization and Cloud Computing</title>
		<link>http://blog.dediserve.com/virtual-vs-dedicated-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtual Vs Dedicated Servers &#124; dediserve Blog &#124; Web Hosting Geeks - Shared Web Hosting, VPS, Dedicated Servers, Virtualization and Cloud Computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dediserve.com/?p=175#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] here to see the original: Virtual Vs Dedicated Servers &#124; dediserve Blog        Plurk This Post      MySpace  Ping This Post  Stumble This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to see the original: Virtual Vs Dedicated Servers | dediserve Blog        Plurk This Post      MySpace  Ping This Post  Stumble This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aidan</title>
		<link>http://blog.dediserve.com/virtual-vs-dedicated-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dediserve.com/?p=175#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Excellent points Sam and i completely agree except with regards OS virtualisation, i actually believe this will eventually die out, as paravirtualisation technologies such as Xen offer so much more in terms of functionality and management to the end-user, than users that are stuck sharing the same OS instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points Sam and i completely agree except with regards OS virtualisation, i actually believe this will eventually die out, as paravirtualisation technologies such as Xen offer so much more in terms of functionality and management to the end-user, than users that are stuck sharing the same OS instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Johnston</title>
		<link>http://blog.dediserve.com/virtual-vs-dedicated-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dediserve.com/?p=175#comment-26</guid>
		<description>As I was just saying (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://samj.net/2009/10/bare-metal-cloud-infrastructure-compute.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Bare Metal&quot; cloud infrastructure &quot;compute&quot; services arrive&lt;/a&gt;, there will be three primary types of compute resources available in the coming era of cloud computing:

 - physical machines
 - virtual machines
 - OS virtualisation

Currently (in cloud at least) most of the focus is on VMs and systems like Cisco&#039;s UCS will ensure that this is a vibrant market and compelling option.

However we haven&#039;t heard anywhere near enough about OS virtualisation (what you guys generally call VPSs, where multiple users share the same OS instance) and I think there will be more automation in the provisioning of bare metal too (as evidenced by SoftLayer&#039;s announcement this week).

Ultimately the user doesn&#039;t [need to] care *how* you as a provider manage to execute their workload, provided you do it withing price, performance and other metrics. You could use an &lt;a href=&quot;http://samj.net/2008/07/future-of-cloud-computing-army-of.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;army of monkeys&lt;/a&gt; if that worked for you.

That&#039;s the beauty of cloud - the devil&#039;s in the details and the details are someone else&#039;s problem now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I was just saying (see <a href="http://samj.net/2009/10/bare-metal-cloud-infrastructure-compute.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Bare Metal&#8221; cloud infrastructure &#8220;compute&#8221; services arrive</a>, there will be three primary types of compute resources available in the coming era of cloud computing:</p>
<p> &#8211; physical machines<br />
 &#8211; virtual machines<br />
 &#8211; OS virtualisation</p>
<p>Currently (in cloud at least) most of the focus is on VMs and systems like Cisco&#8217;s UCS will ensure that this is a vibrant market and compelling option.</p>
<p>However we haven&#8217;t heard anywhere near enough about OS virtualisation (what you guys generally call VPSs, where multiple users share the same OS instance) and I think there will be more automation in the provisioning of bare metal too (as evidenced by SoftLayer&#8217;s announcement this week).</p>
<p>Ultimately the user doesn&#8217;t [need to] care *how* you as a provider manage to execute their workload, provided you do it withing price, performance and other metrics. You could use an <a href="http://samj.net/2008/07/future-of-cloud-computing-army-of.html" rel="nofollow">army of monkeys</a> if that worked for you.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the beauty of cloud &#8211; the devil&#8217;s in the details and the details are someone else&#8217;s problem now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
